Job fears for CSIRO workers amid public service hiring freeze

Posted on November 7, 2013. Filed under: Uncategorized |

The article below appeared in the Canberra Times yesterday.  Aren’t many of the senior managers in CSIRO on contract?  No doubt they will also be spared from the purging on non-indefinite staff despite representing a large proportion of the annual salary costs for the organisation.

The article below references to a battleground in relation to the the preferred method of employment within the CSIRO which the Enterprise Agreement states to be “indefinite” tenure as opposed to “fixed-term” or contract appointments.

In 2007 the CSIRO Staff Association commenced action in what was then the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC), the predecessor to the current Fair Work Commission.  The action was taken in relation to the large number of employees (approximately 350-400) who were maintained on fixed-term, some for up to 12 years without review in breach of the Enterprise Agreement.   The Agreement in place at the time obliged the CSIRO to review fixed term appoints every 4 and 7 years, to assess whether the position should be more appropriate deemed “indefinite”.

The end result was that the CSIRO was required to convert those 350-400 positions to indefinite status, which became crucial to many of those long “fixed-term” appointees who were subsequently shed through a process of  organisational restructure and would have otherwise left with little or no entitlement to the redundancy payments that indefinitely tenured employees of the CSIRO.

We would strongly recommend that the CSIRO Staff Association undertake investigation of members who may find themselves in similar circumstances to determine whether the CSIRO has breached their employment conditions.

Job fears for CSIRO workers amid public service hiring freeze

NOEL TOWELL November 07, 2013

CSIRO staff leaders confronted their bosses on Thursday, demanding answers on the fate of more than 1400 ”non-ongoing” workers at the organisation.

The jobs of about 20 per cent of the Commonwealth science group’s 6500 staff were plunged into uncertainty last week after Public Service Minister Eric Abetz imposed a hiring ban on the federal bureaucracy.

The staff freeze threatens to paralyse some of the organisation’s premier research projects, with a ban on hiring, extending or renewing contracts effective immediately. Fairfax Media understands the only exceptions are post-doctoral positions and indigenous recruitment.

”It’s going to be a huge problem,” said one staff member, who wanted to remain anonymous.

CSIRO’s executive and senior staff have been frantically seeking explanations from government as to how the edict is to be interpreted.

”Are there any loopholes or special cases? We’re trying to figure it out. The meetings are ongoing,” the staff member said.

It is not clear if the bans apply retrospectively to the series of three, four and five-year Australian Research Council fellowship positions – grants which Education Minister Christopher Pyne will announce on Friday.

”We have an agreement with the ARC, so does that mean they are exempt? We don’t know. It’s a complete mess,” another CSIRO employee said.

After Thursday afternoon’s talks between the CSIRO Staff Association there appeared to be a large gulf between the sides, with the association saying little and management accusing it of exaggerating the number of jobs on the line.

After the minister’s announcement last week, CSIRO chief Megan Clark said the group, which has a much higher proportion of ”term” staff than other public sector operations, would not be ”entering into any new, or extending existing term or contract employment arrangements”.

The CSIRO has about 990 ”term” workers and about 440 casual staff.

As confusion continued over the jobs of thousands of temps, contractors and other ”non-ongoing” public service workers in government departments around Australia, the service’s workplace authority, the Public Service Commission, had still not responded to departmental bosses’ pleas for guidance on the new rules.

”Further instructions to agencies and APS employees on the interim recruitment arrangements should be available shortly,” a commission spokeswoman said.

CSIRO Staff Association president Michael Borgas said he and his colleagues were meeting the group’s human resources boss Trevor Heldt to try to get some answers on the fate of the term workers.

”It’s a massive concern,” Mr Borgas said.

But after Thursday’s meeting, a CSIRO Staff Association spokesman said they were waiting for more information from management before making any further comment.

A CSIRO spokesman was likewise saying little about the talks but said the number of jobs under threat had been exaggerated.

”The figure quoted of 1500 potential staff under uncertainty is a significant exaggeration,” he said.

”There are approximately 300 non-casual term staff whose terms finish in the 2013-14 financial year and a similar number in the period 2014-15. It is noteworthy that, in normal circumstances, a proportion of these terms are not renewed in any given year.

”Also a significant proportion, up to 40 per cent in some years, of our term appointments are for the purposes of employment of post-doctoral fellows and similar transitional science roles which in the normal course of events do not come with an expectation of renewal,” the spokesman said.

He said that about half of CSIRO’s casual staff came in for renewal each financial year.

”In terms of casual staff the numbers of projected term completions are in the range of 150 to 250 each financial year,” he said.

”CSIRO uses casual staff primarily for seasonal work or for covering absences of administrative support staff – which provides employment opportunities for people who prefer this mode of employment or who may not be able to commit to full-time employment.”

Younger CSIRO staff and research scientists head-hunted from overseas are massively over-represented in the ranks of term workers at the group and the proportion of non-ongoing staff to permanent employees has been an industrial relations battleground at the organisation for several years.

 

Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

6 Responses to “Job fears for CSIRO workers amid public service hiring freeze”

RSS Feed for Victims of Bullying, Harassment, and Victimisation in the CSIRO Comments RSS Feed

When is DR. Clark contract coming to an end? That was conveniently extended just recently isint it? The government directives include that also?

It has been extended by a further 12 months until the end of 2014.

According to the PM, CSIRO imposing a hiring freeze is nothing to do with him. CSIRO is not the APS and not subject to the directive. CSIRO’s hiring freeze is voluntary but it has been dressed up as an imposition by the government. This is a golden opportunity to decrease staff numbers and blame someone else.

Rumour has it that there are going to be a number of cuts in mid- and upper-level management and their associated armies of support personnel, as this top-heavy flagship is in danger of toppling and the board of directors frantically clinging to the mast are disinclined to wear a dunking!

A cynical mind might also point out that this conveniently coincides with the investigation sham which will drop such investigations upon cessation of employment of the invidividuals named which any mug will deduce would encompass many of these fellows!

No-doubt they have got some plush little position like a Vice-Chancellors position or consulting roll to go to.

just makes me stretch it to the end making sure i don’t pay single extra cent in tax. reason being that such people get paid in hundred of thousands dollars of tax money. we cant ensure they are sacked but what we can do is pay zero tax.

Or direct the dollars you would otherwise be paying in tax towards the charities of your choice to ensure you at least have some say in where your money is being spent.

Why pay for useless bureaucrats when you can pay to feed the starving or house the homeless which is far more gratifying.


Where's The Comment Form?

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: