Senior CSIRO managers accused of using private email accounts

Posted on March 17, 2016. Filed under: Uncategorized |

There is one reason and one reason only that senior CSIRO managers would use private email and that is to avoid legal and public scrutiny of decisions which they know they would never otherwise be able to justify.

The CSIRO has invested a considerable amount of money in its Records Management Systems and CSIRO policy (unless management decides to change it on a whim) requires that all employees, irrespective of seniority enter any and every record ( and that includes emails) into the record management system. In fact the CSIRO email system is set up to do just that, sweep the contents of official emails into the Records Management System.  The author of this post spent a considerable period of time working within the CSIRO’s Records Department and knows their processes well.

Quite simply put, a record is any document, discussion, email meeting minute and so on and so forth generated by ANY CSIRO officer in the course of undertaking their appointed duties.  I am sure there is a Records Manager out there who will be able to provide a better definition but for the purposes of this post such a definition will suffice.

Such records are vitally important where they relate to any official decision or decision making process/capacity which is undertaken by an officer of the CSIRO as they are required to justify the end decision.

Obviously the senior managers engaging in this activity are not certain that the contents of these records will enable them to justify the end decision, otherwise why would they seek to hide such discussions from proper scrutiny?

When it comes to decisions relating to the future of its employees, the CSIRO has a very poor track record in meeting its obligations, particularly in relation to its Enterprise Agreement which underpins the rights and responsibilities of CSIRO employees.  One potential reason why such senior managers may wish to hide their discussions is so that they can avoid their lawful obligation under the Enterprise Agreement in advising the CSIRO Staff Association of their intentions relating to a reduction in staff numbers.  The decision to hide such discussions may also be a means to  avoid engaging in discussions with employees where such decisions are likely to significantly affect the way in which CSIRO employees undertake their work which is also an obligation under the existing Enterprise Agreement which it must be noted the CSIRO has failed to renegotiate with employees since it expired in 2014.

In any event, such deceitful practices from Senior CSIRO Management must be ceased immediately and those to be engaging in such practices be made answerable to a charge of misconduct.

Know more?  Feel free to drop us a confidential email at: victimsofcsiro@gmail.com

CSIRO’s use of private email looks ‘dubious’, says Senate clerk

Senate committee examining job cuts signals it will ask auditor general to investigate senior staff’s private email use

Protesters at a rally in support of the CSIRO
Protesters at a rally in support of the CSIRO. The Senate clerk says the use of private email may be a breach of the CSIRO’s code of conduct. Photograph: Dan Peled/AAP

The use of private email by senior staff to discuss job cuts at the CSIRO “looks like dubious administration” and may be a breach of its code of conduct, the Senate clerk has said.

The assessment has prompted the Senate committee examining CSIRO job cuts to signal it will ask the auditor general to investigate senior officers’ use of private email.

On Friday, Peter Craig, the director of the CSIRO’s weather research collaboration with the bureau of meteorology, told a Senate committee at least seven people in the CSIRO’s ocean and atmosphere division had used private emails to discuss job cuts because they were directed to do so.

In response to a question on notice he added that it was the oceans and atmosphere division director, Ken Lee, and the deputy director, Andreas Schiller, who had given the verbal direction on 28 November.

The CSIRO claimed it was meeting record-keeping obligations despite use of private email because it would ensure the emails were entered into its system.

In a letter released on Thursday, the Senate clerk, Rosemary Laing, wrote to the Senate committee investigating CSIRO cuts raising concerns about the propriety of using private emails, even if later entered into records.

“Although this subsequent ‘capture’ of the records originally conveyed by private email may not be contrary to the requirements of the Archives Act (or national security), it looks like dubious administration and may be a breach of the organisation’s code of conduct by senior staff,” she said.

The code states CSIRO staff must maintain “complete, reliable and accurate records of the performance of your work-related decisions and activities” and “ensure the proper storage of, and access to, records, including the confidentiality and security of information”.

Laing said: “Furthermore, it has understandably led to concerns that it may create difficulties for the Senate or its committees to seek information.”

The Greens senator Peter Whish-Wilson, chair of the Senate budget scrutiny committee, raised that concern at its 8 February hearing. He said “clearly, if private emails have been used, it is going to be very difficult for us to access information” about an executive meeting that decided to make 350 positions redundant.

“It is very concerning that there is no transparency around this if private emails have been used.”

On Wednesday, Whish-Wilson told the Senate full production of documents was needed to assess CSIRO’s restructure and reprioritisation and “to reverse these cuts to the best climate scientists in the world and to increase funding to this critical area of public good science”.

The opposition’s innovation, industry and science spokesman, Kim Carr, told Guardian Australia he was “deeply concerned that there is a case to answer as to why CSIRO staff were directed to use private emails”. He said this arguably breached two record-keeping laws and the CSIRO code of conduct.

“Given the Senate clerk’s assessment that this action is ‘dubious administration’ the Senate committee will now seek to have the auditor general investigate the matter.”

Carr said: “There are still serious questions of public-sector administration that CSIRO needs to answer.

“How many people were involved? Who issued the directive? What access was there by third parties? How can we be certain the information has been returned to the CSIRO and is secure?”

CSIRO denied there was a directive to use private emails.

At an earlier Senate committee hearing Alex Wonhas, the CSIRO’s environment, energy and resources executive director, said private emails were used to plan job cuts to ensure “information stays within a small group of people to not cause distress and concern among staff”.

On Wednesday the cabinet secretary, Arthur Sinodinos, told the Senate he had advice from the attorney general’s office and finance department that CSIRO officials had not breached their obligations.

“CSIRO senior staff have been reminded of the policy regarding the private use of emails,” he said. “If there are further concerns, these are best raised directly with the CSIRO, who are an independent authority with full responsibility for these matters.”

Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: